When we think about the people Jesus chose to follow him, an interesting question emerges. Why fishermen? Why a tax collector? Why people who, for the most part, held no recognized positions of religious authority? If Jesus intended to announce the kingdom of God and establish a movement that would eventually spread far beyond Galilee, wouldn't it have made more sense to recruit experienced religious scholars, influential leaders, or people with established reputations?
The Gospel accounts present a very different picture. Jesus calls people from the ordinary circumstances of their lives and invites them into a journey they do not yet fully understand. They bring their occupations, personalities, assumptions, strengths, and weaknesses with them. Rather than selecting a group of people who already possess all the answers, Jesus gathers people who will learn through relationships, experiences, questions, mistakes, and participation.
Who Were the People Jesus Called?
Several of Jesus' earliest disciples were fishermen working around the Sea of Galilee. In Mark 1:16–20, Simon and Andrew are casting nets when Jesus calls them, while James and John are preparing their nets nearby. Fishing was not simply a recreational activity or an occupation requiring little ability. It involved physical labor, practical knowledge, cooperation, and participation in the economic life of the region.
In Mark 2:13–17, Jesus calls Levi from a tax collection booth. Tax collectors operated within a system associated with Roman authority and could be viewed with suspicion or resentment by their neighbors. Levi's background differed considerably from that of the fishermen, yet Jesus invited him into the same developing community.
Luke 6:12–16 identifies the Twelve and includes Simon, who is called a Zealot. The precise significance of that designation is debated, but it suggests an identity quite different from that associated with tax collection. Jesus brought together people whose backgrounds and perspectives were not necessarily compatible. Their common invitation did not mean they began with common assumptions.
Ordinary Does Not Mean Unqualified
It's easy to romanticize the disciples as simple, uneducated men who had nothing to offer until Jesus appeared. But the Gospel accounts do not provide enough information to support sweeping conclusions about their intelligence, literacy, or capabilities. We know relatively little about the education and earlier lives of many of the Twelve.
What we do see is that Jesus did not make recognized religious status a prerequisite for joining him. His invitation was not restricted to those who had already demonstrated theological mastery or earned positions within the religious establishment.
That distinction matters. Ordinary people possess experience, judgment, skills, and perspectives that may not be recognized by established institutions. Jesus' choice of disciples challenges the assumption that meaningful participation in God's work must begin with institutional recognition or religious credentials.
Jesus Called People to Follow Before They Fully Understood
When Jesus called the fishermen in Mark 1, he invited them to follow him and spoke of making them fishers of people. They could not have understood everything that invitation would eventually involve. Throughout the Gospel narratives, the disciples repeatedly struggle to understand Jesus' teaching, his mission, and even the nature of the kingdom he announces.
In Mark 8:27–33, Peter recognizes Jesus as the Messiah but immediately struggles with Jesus' description of suffering and rejection. His understanding is both significant and incomplete. Jesus corrects him, revealing how deeply Peter's expectations still shape his interpretation of what Jesus is doing.
This is one of the remarkable features of discipleship in the Gospels. Understanding develops along the way. Jesus teaches, demonstrates, questions, corrects, and invites his followers to reconsider their assumptions. They are not required to possess complete theological certainty before beginning the journey.
The Disciples Were Participants, Not Spectators
Jesus did more than gather an audience to listen to his teaching. He involved his disciples in the work of his ministry. In Mark 6:7–13, he sends the Twelve out in pairs, giving them responsibility to proclaim repentance and minister to others. Their learning involves participation, not merely observation.
That pattern challenges the idea that spiritual formation happens primarily through receiving information from a religious expert. Teaching matters, but the disciples also learn through doing, encountering people, making decisions, and discovering the limits of their understanding.
The distinction is important for contemporary Christian communities. If discipleship is understood only as attending services, listening to sermons, and accepting instructions, ordinary members may become spectators in a community they are meant to help shape. The Gospel accounts invite us to consider a more participatory understanding of following Jesus.
Jesus Challenged Their Understanding of Greatness
Although the disciples came from relatively ordinary backgrounds, they were not immune to the desire for status and recognition. In Mark 9:33–37, they argue about who is greatest. Jesus responds by placing a child among them and teaching that those who want to be first must become last and servants of all.
The lesson challenges their assumptions about importance. Even within a group called by Jesus, the temptation to establish hierarchies of worth remains. The disciples must learn that the values of the kingdom differ from conventional understandings of power and prestige.
This connects to Jesus' teaching in Mark 10:42–45, where he contrasts rulers who exercise authority over others with the servant-oriented leadership expected among his followers. Jesus does not merely replace one set of powerful people with another. He challenges the way greatness and authority are understood.
Their Differences Became Part of Their Formation
The disciples were not a collection of interchangeable individuals. Peter is frequently outspoken, Thomas asks questions, and the brothers James and John sometimes display ambitions that Jesus must confront. Their differences create opportunities for learning, correction, and growth.
In John 20:24–29, Thomas struggles to accept the other disciples' testimony about the resurrection. The narrative does not present his questions as the end of his relationship with the community. Jesus encounters Thomas within his uncertainty, and Thomas responds with a profound confession.
The Gospel accounts remind us that belonging to a community does not require everyone to think alike, respond identically, or develop at the same pace. Different personalities and experiences can challenge a community to practice patience, humility, and understanding.
What Does This Tell Us About Belonging?
The fact that Jesus called ordinary people raises an important question about how churches understand participation today. Do we value people because of their titles, credentials, financial contributions, or agreement with established leadership? Or do we recognize that people bring meaningful gifts and perspectives simply by being part of the community?
In 1 Corinthians 12, Paul describes the church through the image of a body composed of many different members. Writing to a community experiencing division and competition over spiritual gifts, he emphasizes that the members who appear less important are nevertheless necessary. The metaphor challenges any understanding of community in which a small number of prominent individuals are treated as indispensable while everyone else is expected merely to observe.
Jesus' choice of disciples does not mean every person must occupy the same leadership role or that experience and preparation are irrelevant. It does suggest that the worth of a person and their capacity to contribute cannot be measured solely by institutional status.
Jesus Was Forming People, Not Simply Filling Positions
Perhaps the most significant feature of Jesus' calling is that the disciples were not finished products. Peter would deny knowing Jesus. The disciples would misunderstand his teaching, struggle with fear, and disagree about their roles. Yet their stories do not end with their failures.
In Acts 4:13, Peter and John are described by the religious authorities as ordinary, unschooled men, yet their courage attracts attention. The description reflects how those authorities perceived them; it does not establish that they possessed no education or ability. What matters in the narrative is that their association with Jesus has become recognizable.
Jesus' invitation was not simply about finding people who could perform particular tasks. It was about forming a community whose lives would increasingly reflect what he had taught and demonstrated. Their transformation unfolded through shared experience, service, failure, correction, and renewed understanding.
What Does Jesus' Choice Mean for Us Today?
If Jesus had built his movement exclusively around established religious authorities, it might have reinforced the assumption that meaningful participation in God's kingdom belongs primarily to those with recognized credentials. Instead, the Gospels describe people from ordinary circumstances being invited into an extraordinary journey of learning and transformation.
This does not eliminate the value of education, experience, or responsible leadership. It does challenge the tendency to confuse religious position with spiritual maturity, or institutional authority with wisdom.
Following Jesus today involves recognizing that people are more than their occupations, backgrounds, theological knowledge, or social standing. It also involves understanding that discipleship is not reserved for those who already have everything figured out.
Jesus did not wait for his disciples to become extraordinary before inviting them to follow. Their willingness to follow became part of the process through which they were changed.
Questions Worth Wrestling With
-
Do I assume that people with religious titles or formal education are necessarily more spiritually mature?
-
How does Jesus' choice of ordinary disciples challenge my understanding of who can contribute to a Christian community?
-
Do our churches invite people into meaningful participation, or primarily expect them to listen and follow instructions?
-
Am I willing to learn alongside people whose backgrounds, experiences, and perspectives differ from my own?
-
Have I confused having the right answers with becoming more like Jesus?
-
What might change if we understood discipleship as a process of formation rather than a qualification people must achieve before they belong?